
You can very easily look through past versions of anything that has been backed up. Every now and then you glance down at the external hard drive and see that the light is blinking. I like Time Machine because it's built-in and always quietly working. as they also should techincally be cloned elsewhere too.īacking up is a pain really, and if you've ever suffered losses before that's cost you time/money then it's easy to become over OCD about it. Things get trickier when you're archiving out to local disks. But make sure you have at least a local and external backup to be on the safe side, and at least one you want to be incremental for file rollbacks. So yeah, CCC for a true boot disk clone 100% over time machine.


But that's mainly because my internet connection would take days to restore everything from scratch. If i had entire system failure i'd restore my newest CCC (If i'm busy/lazy i can be 3 months away from my last clone) - which is basically my entire OS and it's apps/settings - and then i would restore data i needed from cloud. CCC for me is more of a failsafe, and i feel comfortable knowing i have the entire contents stored locally. Copy the crack on an installed directory.Time machine is set and forget, very easy to setup and integrates well with MacOS - it's never failed for me personally - but it won't create a boot drive as such, it gives you the option of restoring a boot drive to your SSD/HDD via the MacOS recovery options though.ĬCC i've only used for complete system snapshots which i do 5-6 times a year manually now, and that does create a bootable drive - you can clone to a second drive.Īs long as you have a local backup which you can use for quick rollbacks and an offsite/cloud backup you're golden or most situations.Download the file from the link down below.Capacity to send a duplicate to another PC in home system or server.Planning (documenting each hour, consistently, consistently or consistently).EfThe effortlessness reestablishing records.

